May 4, The first step the U.
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract The powerful positive results of implementing teamwork are not always achieved. It has been suggested that attempts to implement theories regarding teamwork do not always lead to those theories being put into practice, and as a result positive outcomes are not always found.
The participation of employees in the development and implementation of an intervention may help to ensure that changes take place. Pre-intervention levels of autonomy and job satisfaction predicted the degree of employee participation in the planning and implementation of the intervention.
Pre-intervention well-being and social support were linked directly to the degree to which employees reported changes in existing work practices concerning teamwork. In addition, participation and changes in work procedures were significantly associated with post-intervention autonomy, social support and well-being.
The results indicate that employee participation in intervention processes is crucial in what appears to be an important association with perceived changes in procedures and, therefore, in intervention outcomes. However, in a review of the research literature, Bambra, Egan, Thomas, Petticrew, and Whitehead reported that team intervention effects have been inconsistent.
They suggested that this could be because of the faulty development and implementation of some teamwork interventions. In this study we examine the importance of implementation processes in a team implementation intervention. There is some evidence that the significant changes in existing procedures e.
In this study we examined two neglected aspects of the teamwork intervention process in order to understand better the mediating mechanisms underpinning effective teamwork implementation. This is in contrast to much previous research in which the assumption is often that teamworking is being implemented according to plan.
We did this to test whether employees targeted during the intervention perceived that changes in procedures concerning teamwork had taken place Argyris,and whether the reporting of these changes was related to intervention outcomes. Second, we examined the role of employee participation in the intervention processes.
Hurrell has suggested that intervention outcomes may also be directly linked to the psychological impact of participatory problem-solving processes. Changes in procedures as active ingredients of teamwork Argyris argued that espoused theories the attitudes, values, policies and practices that are verbalized need to become theories-in-use the attitudes, values, policies and practices that are enacted for interventions to be effective.
Significant, noticeable and sustainable changes in existing values and practices, in order to successfully implement organizational change, are what Argyris labelled double-loop organizational learning.
Research has shown that such changes are required for teamwork implementation to be an effective intervention.
Parker and Williams showed in a review that effective teamwork was driven by changes in structures and procedures that led to significant changes in work design, i.
When employees become jointly responsible for completing a task they must interact in a different way by supporting each other more when completing the task van Mierlo et al. Teamwork theories-in-use result in individual team members having more opportunities to make decisions about how to complete work tasks and plan their work: Exposure to procedures that support employees in making decisions and supporting each other in completing the team's tasks has been linked to increased affective well-being and job satisfaction van Mierlo et al.
It has been argued that these positive effects can only be expected if employees experience teamwork theories-in-use that have implications for perceived working conditions Argyris, No previous study of teamwork implementation has included a direct test of whether the teamwork intervention has become a theory-in-use rather than an espoused theory.
In this study we used a direct measure of perceived changes in work procedures as an indicator of theories-in-use. We defined these changes as the degree to which employees had openly discussed previous work procedures and decided which procedures to keep and which to change, and whether actual working procedures had changed and unconstructive work procedures been abandoned as a result of the team implementation intervention.
We predicted that the reporting of theories-in-use would be related to post-intervention social support and autonomy. The extent to which participants report changes in work procedures brought about by the intervention will be positively related to post-intervention measures of intervention impact i.
This participatory approach to implementing teamwork meant that employees were involved in: Double-loop organizational learning is often evident in change processes that draw upon employee expertise, and appears to be associated with increased dialogue between key stakeholders in the change process and a critical analysis of change options Rosskam, There is also some direct evidence of the effects of participation on employee exposure to interventions.
Nielsen, Randall, and Albertsen showed that employee influence over the content of an intervention was linked to uptake of intervention activities. Therefore, we tested whether participation in intervention planning and implementation increased the likelihood of employees reporting changes in existing procedures i.
Employee participation in the intervention design and implementation process measured at Time 2 will be positively associated with the reporting of changes in work procedures at Time 2.
Mechanisms linking participation and intervention outcomes The activities involved in participatory organizational interventions often include a collaborative problem-solving dialogue Rosskam, This dialogue has often been designed to make those involved feel more supported by colleagues Mikkelsen, Essay on Thomas Keller Research first became interested in cooking and got his start in the kitchen.
During the summertime, he would work at the Palm Beach Yacht Club, which was managed by his mother, Betty Keller, where he started as a dishwasher and worked his way up to a cook. The Thomas Cook Groups hierarchy of strategy is pretty straightforward, with the Thomas Cook Group being the corporate brand, and then having a number of SBUs below, followed by the functional departments for each SBU.
Dominos Pizza is a food industry which is a general pizza supply business. Its headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
This organization Proven in 10 June , in Ypsilanti, Michigan by both brothers Tom Monaghanand J. Patrick Doyle. Essay on Organization & Personnel of Thomas Cook the Thomas Cook Group 4 * What are the products and/or services the organization offers? The Thomas Cook Group at this moment is one of the leading Leisure travel organizations in the world, counting £ billion sales and million customers, annually.
It is operating in six. May 03, · The powerful positive results of implementing teamwork are not always achieved. It has been suggested that attempts to implement theories regarding teamwork do not always lead to those theories being put into practice, and as a result positive outcomes are not always found.
Organization & Personnel of Thomas Cook Essay Sample ; School Organization Essay Sample ; send me this sample.
Topic: Self-organization theory Essay. How About Make It Original? Let us edit for you at only $ to make it % original. PROCEED. If you .