Gun laws should not prevent people from carrying guns to protect themselves

Advertisement In Brief The claim that gun ownership stops crime is common in the U. But about 30 careful studies show more guns are linked to more crimes:

Gun laws should not prevent people from carrying guns to protect themselves

The assertion that guns offer protection is a mantra the NRA has repeated often. In the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting, LaPierre opined: Academics such as John Lott and Gary Kleck have long claimed that more firearms reduce crime. But is this really the case?

Stripped of machismo bluster, this is at heart a testable claim that merely requires sturdy epidemiological analysis. And this was precisely what Prof Charles Branas and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania examined in their paper investigating the link between gun possession and gun assault.

They compared cases in which people were injured in a shooting incident with people living in the same area that had not suffered a gun injury. The researchers matched these "controls" for age, race and gender. They found that those with firearms were about 4. The reasons for this, the authors suggest, are manifold.

Along the same lines, individuals who are in possession of a gun may increase their risk of gun assault by entering dangerous environments that they would have normally avoided. Alternatively, an individual may bring a gun to an otherwise gun-free conflict only to have that gun wrested away and turned on them.

Prof David Hemenway of Harvard school of public health has published numerous academic investigations in this area and found that such claims are rooted far more in myth than fact.

While defensive gun use may occasionally occur successfully, it is rare and very much the exception — it doesn't change the fact that actually owning and using a firearm hugely increases the risk of being shot.

This is a finding supported by numerous other studies in health policy, including several articles in the New England Journal of Medicine. Arguments to the contrary are not rooted in reality; the Branas study also found that for individuals who had time to resist and counter in a gun assault, the odds of actually being shot actually increased to 5.

The problem goes deeper than this, however. There's good evidence that the very act of being in possession of a weapon has an unfortunate effect of making us suspect others have one too. This was shown in a paper by psychologists Prof Jessica Witt and Dr James Brockmolewhere subjects were given either a replica gun or a neutral object and asked to identify the objects other people were holding.

Subjects in possession of a replica firearm were much more likely to identify a neutral object as a firearm. The erroneous assumption that someone else is armed can and does often end in tragedy.

Guns don't offer protection – whatever the National Rifle Association says | Science | The Guardian

Indeed, the evidence suggests the very act of being armed changes one's perception of others to a decidedly more paranoid one. Other studies have shown an element of racial priming too, where a black subject is more likely to be assumed to be carrying a weapon. Guns have a curious psychological effect beyond this: LaPierre's proclamation bears the hallmarks of a litany of misconceptions.

Gun aficionados often frame the debate in terms of protection, but it is vital to realise that the vast majority of rape and murder victims are not harmed by nefarious strangers, but by people they know, and often love — friends, family members, lovers.

Far from protecting people and keeping families safe, the sad truth is that firearms are often used in episodes of domestic violence.

The John Hopkins centre for gun policy research has some sobering facts on this ; women living in a home with one or more guns were three times more likely to be murdered; for women who had been abused by their partner, their risk of being murdered rose fivefold if the partner owned a gun.

So LaPierre's "good woman with a gun" is actually, it seems, putting herself in danger. Viewed in this light, the NRA's insistence that rapes can be prevented with firearms or that teachers should be armed appear even more stupid than they already seemed. It is worth remembering that just as America leads the world in gun ownership, so too does it lead the world in gun homicide, with 11, to 12, murders committed by firearms each year.

The tired old rationalisation that guns protect people is frankly contradicted by the evidence. The inescapable conclusion is that gun ownership makes everyone less safe. The logic the NRA espouses is perverse and transparently self-serving — the solution to gun crimes is not more guns, and no amount of rhetorical dexterity can surmount this fact.

If the US is to have a truly honest discussion about its gun culture, it needs to be rooted in fact rather than fantasy, and the sound and fury from the NRA should be dismissed with the contempt it deserves.Should people be allowed to carry guns?

50% Say Yes 50% Say No (the answer is never) taking guns away from law abiding citizens will not stop anything. Heck, some highschooler in Pennsylvania just snapped and went on a knife attack, using gun grabber logic we should start banning knives.

they should have the right to protect themselves. Should women have a gun permit to protect themselves? Absolutely not. Women ought to have guns to protect themselves, without needing to beg the indulgence of the State for permission to keep themselves safe..

Gun laws should not prevent people from carrying guns to protect themselves

Considering that women are smaller, slower, and weaker than men, on average, I cannot fathom how women can be anti-gun, considering the advantage it gives them in self defense. You may think that the solution to prevent rape is to carry a gun, but is that enough? Women Do Not Need Guns to Protect Themselves From Rape that in order to prevent rape, women should.

The claim that gun ownership stops crime is common in the U.S., and that belief drives laws that make it easy to own and keep firearms.; But about 30 careful studies show more guns are linked to.

More Guns Do Not Stop More Crimes, Evidence Shows. popular claim made by the gun lobby: that more guns protect more people from crime. when laws make it easier for people to carry guns or. Make Sure You Know Your Gun Control Arguments For and Against. for the people to protect themselves from any form of violation of civil liberties and freedoms.

such as storing guns in gun safes or applying trigger locks to the weapons, it is more important to educate people about firearms, especially children.

Concealed Guns